True-to-Size Millimeter Sizing Comparison
Dr. Martens 1460 vs UGG Classic Short II
Detailed size conversion chart, cavity measurements in millimeters, and crowd-sourced fit advice for choosing your perfect size.
Interactive Size Converter
Select what size you wear in the 1460 to see your calculated size in the Classic Short II.
Complete Size Conversion Matrix
Direct millimeter-calibrated mapping comparing all available sizes between both shoes.
| 1460 (US) | Internal Cavity | Classic Short II Equivalent | Match Accuracy | Fit Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US 4.5 | 233 mm | EU 36 | 20% | +6.8 mm |
| US 5 | 237 mm | EU 36 | 67% | +2.8 mm |
| US 5.5 | 240 mm | EU 36 | 98% | -0.2 mm |
| US 6 | 243 mm | EU 37 | 55% | +3.8 mm |
| US 6.5 | 247 mm | EU 37 | 98% | -0.2 mm |
| US 7 | 250 mm | EU 38 | 67% | +2.8 mm |
| US 7.5 | 253 mm | EU 38 | 98% | -0.2 mm |
| US 8 | 257 mm | EU 39 | 67% | +2.8 mm |
| US 8.5 | 260 mm | EU 39 | 98% | -0.2 mm |
| US 9 | 267 mm | EU 40 | 98% | -0.2 mm |
| US 9.5 | 270 mm | EU 41 | 67% | +2.8 mm |
| US 10 | 273 mm | EU 41 | 98% | -0.2 mm |
| US 10.5 | 277 mm | EU 42 | 67% | +2.8 mm |
| US 11 | 280 mm | EU 42 | 98% | -0.2 mm |
Related Comparisons
Direct Rivalry1460 vs Classic Mini IIView Sizing ComparisonDirect RivalryTerrain H2O vs 1460View Sizing ComparisonDirect Rivalry1460 vs THERMOBALL Traction BootieView Sizing Comparisonugg ComparisonClassic Mini II vs Classic Short IIView Sizing Comparisonugg ComparisonAnsley vs Classic Short IIView Sizing Comparisonugg ComparisonBailey Bow II vs Classic Short IIView Sizing Comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
How does the 1460 size compare to the Classic Short II?
Both shoes share a very similar length profile. We recommend ordering your standard size in both. The 1460 has an internal fit offset of 0.16mm compared to -0.04mm for the Classic Short II.
Do these shoes fit wide feet comfortably?
The 1460 has a snug/narrow width profile, while the Classic Short II is snug/narrow.