True-to-Size Millimeter Sizing Comparison

UGG Ansley vs UGG Classic Short II

Detailed size conversion chart, cavity measurements in millimeters, and crowd-sourced fit advice for choosing your perfect size.

Shoe Awomen
4.0(8,435 reviews)
Fit TendencyTrue to Size
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full Ansley Breakdown
5.0(17,044 reviews)
Fit TendencyTrue to Size
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full Classic Short II Breakdown
Fit Verdict

True to Size Comparison

Both shoes share a very similar length profile. We recommend ordering your standard size in both.

Length Delta+0.72 mm
Width Delta+0.15 mm

Interactive Size Converter

Select what size you wear in the Ansley to see your calculated size in the Classic Short II.

Recommended Size in UGG Classic Short II
EU 4191% Match

Internal shoe cavity difference: +0.7 mm (slightly roomier)

Alternate option if between sizes: EU 40 (38% match)

Complete Size Conversion Matrix

Direct millimeter-calibrated mapping comparing all available sizes between both shoes.

Ansley (US)Internal CavityClassic Short II EquivalentMatch AccuracyFit Difference
EU 36239 mmEU 3691%+0.7 mm
EU 37246 mmEU 3791%+0.7 mm
EU 38252 mmEU 3891%+0.7 mm
EU 39259 mmEU 3991%+0.7 mm
EU 40266 mmEU 4091%+0.7 mm
EU 41272 mmEU 4191%+0.7 mm
EU 42279 mmEU 4291%+0.7 mm
EU 43286 mmEU 4391%+0.7 mm
EU 44292 mmEU 4491%+0.7 mm
EU 45299 mmEU 4591%+0.7 mm

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the Ansley size compare to the Classic Short II?

Both shoes share a very similar length profile. We recommend ordering your standard size in both. The Ansley has an internal fit offset of -0.76mm compared to -0.04mm for the Classic Short II.

Do these shoes fit wide feet comfortably?

The Ansley has a snug/narrow width profile, while the Classic Short II is snug/narrow.