True-to-Size Millimeter Sizing Comparison

Dr. Martens 1460 vs UGG Classic Mini II

Detailed size conversion chart, cavity measurements in millimeters, and crowd-sourced fit advice for choosing your perfect size.

Shoe Awomen
4.8(3,450 reviews)
Fit TendencyTrue to Size
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full 1460 Breakdown
5.0(9,282 reviews)
Fit TendencyTrue to Size
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full Classic Mini II Breakdown
Fit Verdict

True to Size Comparison

Both shoes share a very similar length profile. We recommend ordering your standard size in both.

Length Delta-0.08 mm
Width Delta+0.3 mm

Interactive Size Converter

Select what size you wear in the 1460 to see your calculated size in the Classic Mini II.

Recommended Size in UGG Classic Mini II
EU 3965% Match

Internal shoe cavity difference: +2.9 mm (slightly roomier)

Alternate option if between sizes: EU 38 (52% match)

Complete Size Conversion Matrix

Direct millimeter-calibrated mapping comparing all available sizes between both shoes.

1460 (US)Internal CavityClassic Mini II EquivalentMatch AccuracyFit Difference
US 4.5233 mmEU 3618%+6.9 mm
US 5237 mmEU 3665%+2.9 mm
US 5.5240 mmEU 3699%-0.1 mm
US 6243 mmEU 3754%+3.9 mm
US 6.5247 mmEU 3799%-0.1 mm
US 7250 mmEU 3865%+2.9 mm
US 7.5253 mmEU 3899%-0.1 mm
US 8257 mmEU 3965%+2.9 mm
US 8.5260 mmEU 3999%-0.1 mm
US 9267 mmEU 4099%-0.1 mm
US 9.5270 mmEU 4165%+2.9 mm
US 10273 mmEU 4199%-0.1 mm
US 10.5277 mmEU 4265%+2.9 mm
US 11280 mmEU 4299%-0.1 mm

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the 1460 size compare to the Classic Mini II?

Both shoes share a very similar length profile. We recommend ordering your standard size in both. The 1460 has an internal fit offset of 0.16mm compared to 0.08mm for the Classic Mini II.

Do these shoes fit wide feet comfortably?

The 1460 has a snug/narrow width profile, while the Classic Mini II is snug/narrow.