True-to-Size Millimeter Sizing Comparison

Timberland Linden Woods vs UGG Classic Short II

Detailed size conversion chart, cavity measurements in millimeters, and crowd-sourced fit advice for choosing your perfect size.

4.8(2,237 reviews)
Fit TendencyTrue to Size
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full Linden Woods Breakdown
5.0(17,044 reviews)
Fit TendencyTrue to Size
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full Classic Short II Breakdown
Fit Verdict

True to Size Comparison

Both shoes share a very similar length profile. We recommend ordering your standard size in both.

Length Delta-0.24 mm
Width Delta-0.3 mm

Interactive Size Converter

Select what size you wear in the Linden Woods to see your calculated size in the Classic Short II.

Recommended Size in UGG Classic Short II
EU 4467% Match

Internal shoe cavity difference: +2.8 mm (slightly roomier)

Alternate option if between sizes: EU 43 (62% match)

Complete Size Conversion Matrix

Direct millimeter-calibrated mapping comparing all available sizes between both shoes.

Linden Woods (US)Internal CavityClassic Short II EquivalentMatch AccuracyFit Difference
EU 40267 mmEU 4097%-0.2 mm
EU 41273 mmEU 4197%-0.2 mm
EU 41.5277 mmEU 4267%+2.8 mm
EU 42280 mmEU 4297%-0.2 mm
EU 43287 mmEU 4397%-0.2 mm
EU 43.5290 mmEU 4467%+2.8 mm
EU 44293 mmEU 4497%-0.2 mm
EU 44.5297 mmEU 4567%+2.8 mm
EU 45300 mmEU 4597%-0.2 mm
EU 45.5303 mmEU 4562%-3.2 mm
EU 46307 mmEU 4514%-7.2 mm

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the Linden Woods size compare to the Classic Short II?

Both shoes share a very similar length profile. We recommend ordering your standard size in both. The Linden Woods has an internal fit offset of 0.2mm compared to -0.04mm for the Classic Short II.

Do these shoes fit wide feet comfortably?

The Linden Woods has a roomy/wide width profile, while the Classic Short II is snug/narrow.