True-to-Size Millimeter Sizing Comparison

Timberland Linden Woods vs Timberland Mt. Maddsen Mid Leather Waterproof

Detailed size conversion chart, cavity measurements in millimeters, and crowd-sourced fit advice for choosing your perfect size.

4.8(2,237 reviews)
Fit TendencyTrue to Size
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full Linden Woods Breakdown
4.0(521 reviews)
Fit TendencyTrue to Size
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full Mt. Maddsen Mid Leather Waterproof Breakdown
Fit Verdict

True to Size Comparison

Both shoes share a very similar length profile. We recommend ordering your standard size in both.

Length Delta-0.2 mm
Width Delta-0.24 mm

Interactive Size Converter

Select what size you wear in the Linden Woods to see your calculated size in the Mt. Maddsen Mid Leather Waterproof.

Recommended Size in Timberland Mt. Maddsen Mid Leather Waterproof
US 9.598% Match

Internal shoe cavity difference: -0.2 mm (snugger)

Complete Size Conversion Matrix

Direct millimeter-calibrated mapping comparing all available sizes between both shoes.

Linden Woods (US)Internal CavityMt. Maddsen Mid Leather Waterproof EquivalentMatch AccuracyFit Difference
EU 40267 mmUS 798%-0.2 mm
EU 41273 mmUS 7.598%-0.2 mm
EU 41.5277 mmUS 898%-0.2 mm
EU 42280 mmUS 8.598%-0.2 mm
EU 43287 mmUS 998%-0.2 mm
EU 43.5290 mmUS 9.598%-0.2 mm
EU 44293 mmUS 1098%-0.2 mm
EU 44.5297 mmUS 10.598%-0.2 mm
EU 45300 mmUS 1198%-0.2 mm
EU 45.5303 mmUS 11.598%-0.2 mm
EU 46307 mmUS 1298%-0.2 mm

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the Linden Woods size compare to the Mt. Maddsen Mid Leather Waterproof?

Both shoes share a very similar length profile. We recommend ordering your standard size in both. The Linden Woods has an internal fit offset of 0.2mm compared to 0mm for the Mt. Maddsen Mid Leather Waterproof.

Do these shoes fit wide feet comfortably?

The Linden Woods has a roomy/wide width profile, while the Mt. Maddsen Mid Leather Waterproof is standard medium.