True-to-Size Millimeter Sizing Comparison

Dr. Martens 2976 Chelsea vs UGG Classic Short II

Detailed size conversion chart, cavity measurements in millimeters, and crowd-sourced fit advice for choosing your perfect size.

4.7(957 reviews)
Fit TendencyTrue to Size
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full 2976 Chelsea Breakdown
5.0(17,044 reviews)
Fit TendencyTrue to Size
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full Classic Short II Breakdown
Fit Verdict

True to Size Comparison

Both shoes share a very similar length profile. We recommend ordering your standard size in both.

Length Delta+0.04 mm
Width Delta+0.24 mm

Interactive Size Converter

Select what size you wear in the 2976 Chelsea to see your calculated size in the Classic Short II.

Recommended Size in UGG Classic Short II
EU 3964% Match

Internal shoe cavity difference: +3.0 mm (slightly roomier)

Alternate option if between sizes: EU 38 (53% match)

Complete Size Conversion Matrix

Direct millimeter-calibrated mapping comparing all available sizes between both shoes.

2976 Chelsea (US)Internal CavityClassic Short II EquivalentMatch AccuracyFit Difference
US 4.5233 mmEU 3617%+7.0 mm
US 5237 mmEU 3664%+3.0 mm
US 5.5240 mmEU 36100%+0.0 mm
US 6243 mmEU 3752%+4.0 mm
US 6.5247 mmEU 37100%+0.0 mm
US 7250 mmEU 3864%+3.0 mm
US 7.5253 mmEU 38100%+0.0 mm
US 8257 mmEU 3964%+3.0 mm
US 8.5260 mmEU 39100%+0.0 mm
US 9267 mmEU 40100%+0.0 mm
US 9.5270 mmEU 4164%+3.0 mm
US 10273 mmEU 41100%+0.0 mm
US 10.5277 mmEU 4264%+3.0 mm
US 11280 mmEU 42100%+0.0 mm

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the 2976 Chelsea size compare to the Classic Short II?

Both shoes share a very similar length profile. We recommend ordering your standard size in both. The 2976 Chelsea has an internal fit offset of -0.08mm compared to -0.04mm for the Classic Short II.

Do these shoes fit wide feet comfortably?

The 2976 Chelsea has a snug/narrow width profile, while the Classic Short II is snug/narrow.