True-to-Size Millimeter Sizing Comparison

PUMA Iconic Suede Low ASTM EH vs PUMA Touring Low

Detailed size conversion chart, cavity measurements in millimeters, and crowd-sourced fit advice for choosing your perfect size.

4.0(286 reviews)
Fit TendencyTrue to Size
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full Iconic Suede Low ASTM EH Breakdown
4.0(216 reviews)
Fit TendencyRuns Large (+1.16mm)
Width ProfileStandard (Medium)
View Full Touring Low Breakdown
Fit Verdict

True to Size Comparison

Both shoes share a very similar length profile. We recommend ordering your standard size in both.

Length Delta+0.24 mm
Width Delta+0.03 mm

Interactive Size Converter

Select what size you wear in the Iconic Suede Low ASTM EH to see your calculated size in the Touring Low.

Recommended Size in PUMA Touring Low
US 1097% Match

Internal shoe cavity difference: +0.2 mm (slightly roomier)

Complete Size Conversion Matrix

Direct millimeter-calibrated mapping comparing all available sizes between both shoes.

Iconic Suede Low ASTM EH (US)Internal CavityTouring Low EquivalentMatch AccuracyFit Difference
US 6241 mmUS 697%+0.2 mm
US 6.5248 mmUS 6.597%+0.2 mm
US 7251 mmUS 797%+0.2 mm
US 7.5254 mmUS 7.597%+0.2 mm
US 8258 mmUS 897%+0.2 mm
US 8.5261 mmUS 8.597%+0.2 mm
US 9268 mmUS 997%+0.2 mm
US 9.5271 mmUS 9.597%+0.2 mm
US 10274 mmUS 1097%+0.2 mm
US 10.5281 mmUS 10.597%+0.2 mm
US 9.5284 mmUS 9.597%+0.2 mm
US 10288 mmUS 1097%+0.2 mm
US 10.5294 mmUS 10.597%+0.2 mm
US 11298 mmUS 1197%+0.2 mm
US 11.5301 mmUS 11.597%+0.2 mm
US 12308 mmUS 1297%+0.2 mm
US 13314 mmUS 1397%+0.2 mm

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the Iconic Suede Low ASTM EH size compare to the Touring Low?

Both shoes share a very similar length profile. We recommend ordering your standard size in both. The Iconic Suede Low ASTM EH has an internal fit offset of 0.92mm compared to 1.16mm for the Touring Low.

Do these shoes fit wide feet comfortably?

The Iconic Suede Low ASTM EH has a roomy/wide width profile, while the Touring Low is roomy/wide.